noCV
ABOUND-104 · Specify the interactions

Specify a document lifecycle that survives parser retries

Practice briefStoryAdvanced

A retry currently moves a completed document back to processing because delivery events are mistaken for authoritative transitions.

Focused work estimate
3h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
State machines · Idempotency

Estimated field mix

  • System design50%
  • Backend30%
  • Distributed systems20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional procurement portal extracts metadata from uploaded documents. Product wants a responsive upload flow; security wants parser failures isolated from customer-facing processes.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create synthetic upload metadata and a fake processing provider.
  • Treat diagrams as proposals; implement only local contract probes.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Define legal transitions and terminal-state behavior.
  • Bind processing attempts to one immutable upload generation.
  • Reject stale provider completion for a replaced generation.

Implementation constraints

  • Express the transition table as executable tests against a small pure model.

Verification to include

  • Replay valid completion twice and retain one terminal result.
  • Deliver an older generation result after replacement and reject it.

Deliverables

  • State model and transition probes

Rollout and recovery

Use the model to gate implementation review; create a new model version for changed semantics.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice boundary decisions backed by executable consistency and failure checks.

For the team: Review architecture tradeoffs with explicit assumptions before infrastructure commitment.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.