noCV
ACCESS-101 · Map permissions

Write the partner permission matrix from existing routes

Practice briefTaskFoundational

The portal has three roles, but engineers infer permissions from page names. A read-only agent can discover an Edit route that was added for partner administrators.

Focused work estimate
2h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Threat modeling · Authorization design · API inventory

Estimated field mix

  • Security80%
  • System design20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional manufacturing company shares purchase-order documents with partner organizations. Buyers, partner administrators, and read-only agents use the same API. Recent support reports suggest list filters and background downloads disagree about who may see an order.

Setup prerequisites

  • HTTP APIs
  • Session authentication
  • Tenant-scoped data access

Preceding work

No earlier ticket is required. Complete the project setup above.

Acceptance criteria

  • Inventory order, document, invitation, and export actions at route and service boundaries.
  • Define allowed actions for buyer, partner administrator, and read-only agent.
  • Mark unspecified combinations as denied and identify ownership or tenant conditions.

Implementation constraints

  • A hidden button is not an authorization rule; include non-UI callers.

Verification to include

  • Map each fixture route to exactly one documented action.
  • Show explicit denials for agent edits and cross-partner document reads.

Deliverables

  • Permission matrix and route-to-action inventory

Rollout and recovery

Review the matrix before enforcing new checks; record intentional compatibility changes for test clients.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice authorization as a service-level invariant, including revocation timing, concurrent membership changes, and asynchronous data delivery.

For the team: Inspect a concrete record of cross-organization denial, least-privilege decisions, and access-recovery behavior using fictional partner records.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.