noCV
ACLAIM-102 · Define assignment invariants

Order eligible jobs with a stable tie break

Practice briefTaskFoundational

Jobs created at the same instant appear in a different order on each poll, making starvation difficult to reproduce.

Focused work estimate
1h 15m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
SQL ordering · Queue semantics

Estimated field mix

  • Database engineering80%
  • Backend20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional inspection service assigns review jobs to staff. Polling clients sometimes claim the same job and a disconnected client can finish work after reassignment.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create synthetic jobs and two independent database clients.
  • Use explicit state methods and an injected clock.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Order by declared priority, ready time and opaque job ID.
  • Exclude future and terminal jobs explicitly.
  • Bound claim candidate count.

Implementation constraints

  • Document whether priority changes preserve or reset waiting time.

Verification to include

  • Create equal-time jobs and observe stable order.
  • Include future and completed jobs and verify they are ineligible.

Deliverables

  • Eligibility query and ordering fixtures

Rollout and recovery

Introduce the query in read-only inspection first; restore previous routing on semantic mismatch.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice database concurrency, leases and transactional invariants.

For the team: Review whether assignment authority remains reliable during contention and recovery.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.