noCV
ALEASE-101 · Define scheduler authority

Specify scheduler lease state with a separate authority epoch

Practice briefTaskFoundational

The scheduler table stores only owner name and expiry, so an old owner can appear identical to a later process with the same name.

Focused work estimate
1h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Lease modeling · Identity

Estimated field mix

  • Distributed systems100%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional document service runs periodic retention planning on multiple application instances. Paused instances resume after lease expiry and can overlap newer schedulers.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a synthetic maintenance queue and two independent scheduler clients.
  • Use fake time where possible and no destructive real retention actions.

Preceding work

No earlier ticket is required. Complete the project setup above.

Acceptance criteria

  • Include lease identity, holder instance, expiry and monotonic epoch.
  • Define active and expired semantics at the exact boundary.
  • Keep display names outside authority checks.

Implementation constraints

  • Use opaque process-instance identities.

Verification to include

  • Represent two successive owners with distinct epochs.
  • Reuse a display name and verify it cannot impersonate the previous instance.

Deliverables

  • Lease schema and authority contract

Rollout and recovery

Review the schema before scheduler writes; leave coordination disabled until epoch checks exist.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice lease assumptions, fencing and stale-owner rejection.

For the team: Review safe coordination that remains explainable under pauses and recovery.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.