noCV
AREGION-104 · Specify routing authority

Define a read-after-write token for shipment changes

Practice briefStoryAdvanced

A user changes a delivery note, then a regional read immediately shows the previous text.

Focused work estimate
3h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Read-your-writes · Routing

Estimated field mix

  • Distributed systems60%
  • System design40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional logistics dashboard serves distant customers from one primary region. Stakeholders want faster reads and outage recovery but have not agreed which data may be stale.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local primary/replica simulator and synthetic shipment records.
  • Use local models; no multi-region infrastructure is provisioned.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Mutation returns an accepted version token.
  • A subsequent read must meet that version or use a fresh source.
  • Tokens are bound to tenant and resource.

Implementation constraints

  • Implement a small local routing model, not a new replication engine.

Verification to include

  • Write version 4 while the replica has version 3 and route correctly.
  • Reuse another tenant's token and reject it without exposing state.

Deliverables

  • Read-version contract and routing tests

Rollout and recovery

Canary the routing model in a local client; fall back to primary reads when freshness cannot be established.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice consistency tradeoffs, failover authority and recovery assumptions.

For the team: Review regional availability proposals with explicit data-loss and staleness limits.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.