noCV
BARTIF-105 · Control promotion

Bind a promotion decision to current environment state

Practice briefBugAdvanced

Two simultaneous promotion requests overwrite each other's intended release.

Focused work estimate
3h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Concurrency · State transitions

Estimated field mix

  • Platform engineering50%
  • Database engineering30%
  • Cloud infrastructure20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional application team deploys mutable image tags and cannot reliably identify the artifact running during an incident.

Setup prerequisites

  • Author synthetic artifact manifests and a local registry double; do not pull or execute untrusted images.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Require expected environment revision.
  • Record one accepted transition atomically.
  • Reject stale decisions without changing active identity.

Implementation constraints

  • Use a local state store and explicit transition methods.

Verification to include

  • Promote against the current revision.
  • Race two decisions and verify one conflict.

Deliverables

  • Optimistic promotion workflow.

Rollout and recovery

Start with serialized local promotion; preserve every prior revision.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice artifact identity, promotion policies, and release provenance.

For the team: Provide reproducible deployments and a clear path to withdraw defective artifacts.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.