noCV
BBILL-104 · Handle asynchronous results

Apply duplicate and out-of-order payment callbacks idempotently

Practice briefBugAdvanced

A delayed pending callback overwrites an already-confirmed payment.

Focused work estimate
3h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Transactions · Event ordering

Estimated field mix

  • Integrations40%
  • Distributed systems40%
  • Database engineering20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional software vendor changes payment providers. Its application must tolerate unknown outcomes, signed callbacks, refunds, and inconsistent settlement reports.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local payment-provider double and synthetic orders; use test-only signatures and execute no financial transactions.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Deduplicate provider event identity.
  • Apply only allowed state transitions.
  • Record ignored stale events for diagnosis.

Implementation constraints

  • Commit state and processed-event record atomically.

Verification to include

  • Replay a successful callback twice.
  • Deliver pending after confirmed and preserve confirmation.

Deliverables

  • Callback transition handler.

Rollout and recovery

Adopt per synthetic merchant; pause on unresolved transition conflicts.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice idempotent integrations, state reconciliation, and provider migration.

For the team: Provide a reviewable adapter design that protects order consistency and recovery.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.