noCV
BCONTRACT-106 · Verify boundaries

Cover retry semantics for conflicts and transient failures

Practice briefTaskAdvanced

Both clients currently retry every failed write, including conflicting requests.

Focused work estimate
3h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
HTTP semantics · Idempotency

Estimated field mix

  • Quality engineering50%
  • API design30%
  • Distributed systems20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional fulfillment API serves a web checkout and warehouse adapter. Provider tests pass while consumers fail on subtle response and error changes.

Setup prerequisites

  • Author two small local consumers and one mock provider with versioned synthetic responses.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Distinguish conflict, validation, and transient errors.
  • Specify which writes are safely retryable.
  • Preserve request identity across allowed retries.

Implementation constraints

  • Use a deterministic mock clock and bounded retry count.

Verification to include

  • Recover from one transient error.
  • Verify validation and conflicting idempotency reuse are not retried.

Deliverables

  • Error and retry contract suite.

Rollout and recovery

Adopt new error handling with the provider behavior unchanged.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice executable contracts, meaningful negative tests, and compatibility triage.

For the team: Expose integration regressions before deployment without requiring every system to run together.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.