noCV
BDNS-102 · Model DNS responses

Implement TTL-aware positive caching in the resolver fixture

Practice briefTaskIntermediate

The simulator caches every answer forever and cannot represent migration delays.

Focused work estimate
2h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Caching · DNS

Estimated field mix

  • Networking60%
  • Performance engineering40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional internal API is moving to a new endpoint. The team assumes DNS changes are immediate and has no rehearsal for stale clients.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local resolver simulator and two loopback service endpoints with synthetic DNS records; query no external infrastructure.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Expire answers using an injected clock.
  • Honor the declared TTL without extending it on reads.
  • Key cache entries by name and record type.

Implementation constraints

  • Do not use wall-clock sleeps in tests.

Verification to include

  • Serve a cached answer before expiry.
  • Advance time and retrieve the changed authoritative answer.

Deliverables

  • Positive-cache simulator.

Rollout and recovery

Validate the simulator against its documented semantics before using results.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice DNS semantics, migration timing, and network diagnosis.

For the team: Produce a migration plan that makes cache delay and endpoint compatibility explicit.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.