noCV
BEXTRACT-101 · Define extraction rules

Define invoice fields with explicit missing and ambiguous states

Practice briefTaskFoundational

Empty strings currently mean both absent values and extraction failures.

Focused work estimate
1h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Schema design

Estimated field mix

  • Applied AI80%
  • Data engineering20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional procurement team receives inconsistent supplier documents. It wants draft records that staff can review without treating model output as authoritative accounting data.

Setup prerequisites

  • Author synthetic text invoices with ambiguous dates, currencies, and line items; use a deterministic provider double.

Preceding work

No earlier ticket is required. Complete the project setup above.

Acceptance criteria

  • Represent value, missing, and ambiguous states distinctly.
  • Declare required fields before a draft is reviewable.
  • Preserve the original textual date and amount references.

Implementation constraints

  • Do not guess missing tax or currency values.

Verification to include

  • Parse a complete synthetic invoice.
  • Represent missing currency and an ambiguous date without invented values.

Deliverables

  • Extraction schema.

Rollout and recovery

Version the schema before creating drafts; retain raw synthetic source references.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice schema constraints, numerical checks, review workflows, and safe model boundaries.

For the team: Produce an inspectable extraction prototype that can reduce manual transcription while preserving review control.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.