noCV
BLOADSHED-107 · Protect service capacity

Preserve fair access across tenant request queues

Practice briefTaskAdvanced

One large tenant fills every waiting slot and blocks smaller tenants.

Focused work estimate
3h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Fair scheduling

Estimated field mix

  • Performance engineering40%
  • Platform engineering40%
  • Site reliability20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional ticketing service becomes unresponsive during event releases because optional recommendation calls consume the same resources as reservation checks.

Setup prerequisites

  • Build a bounded local service and synthetic open-loop workload generator with controllable dependency delays.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Bound per-tenant queued work.
  • Define a transparent scheduling policy.
  • Prevent idle tenant allocation from wasting all spare capacity.

Implementation constraints

  • Use synthetic tenant classes and document fairness assumptions.

Verification to include

  • Serve concurrent tenants under sustained load.
  • Flood one tenant and verify others retain declared progress.

Deliverables

  • Tenant scheduling policy.

Rollout and recovery

Trial with fixed limits; disable new policy if starvation appears.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice overload behavior, admission control, and fair performance experiments.

For the team: Create predictable failure and degradation behavior under declared capacity constraints.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.