noCV
CAL-104 · Create and change bookings safely

Reserve a slot atomically when two customers choose it

Practice briefStoryExpert

Two clients load the same available slot and submit together. Add an internal reservation transaction and a final provider availability check before creating an event.

Focused work estimate
4h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Database concurrency · Outbox · Distributed consistency · Risk communication

Estimated field mix

  • Database engineering40%
  • Integrations30%
  • Distributed systems30%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional consultancy books appointments across time zones. The first connector duplicates events after timeouts and offers slots during stale calendar sync. Use a local calendar-provider double and synthetic calendars.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local provider double for free/busy, event creation, updates, cancellation, and expiring tokens.
  • Use synthetic calendars and an injected clock; no calendar account or outgoing invitation is required.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Overlapping active reservations for one resource are prevented by a database-backed invariant.
  • Only the winning reservation can enqueue event creation through a transactional outbox.
  • The product distinguishes internal reservation guarantees from provider-side races when the provider lacks atomic hold support.

Implementation constraints

  • Use a barrier-controlled race with two synthetic customers.
  • If the provider cannot guarantee exclusive booking, record the residual conflict state and provide reconciliation.

Verification to include

  • Submit two overlapping reservations concurrently and assert one winner and one outbox event.
  • Introduce an external busy event after the first check and verify the booking is rejected or explicitly reconciled under the declared provider contract.

Deliverables

  • Reservation constraint, outbox flow, and provider-race analysis

Rollout and recovery

Activate one resource at a time with explicit provider guarantees; pause creation if unresolved conflicts accumulate.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice time modeling, conflict-safe booking, external state reconciliation, and credential lifecycle boundaries.

For the team: Review whether integration work protects appointment correctness and offers clear recovery when a provider is uncertain.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.