noCV
CMIGR-105 · Produce conservative edits

Preserve configuration-call comments during transformation

Practice briefBugAdvanced

Comments between arguments vanish in generated output. Attach trivia using a documented preservation rule.

Focused work estimate
3h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Syntax trees · Comments

Estimated field mix

  • Compiler and language tooling100%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

Fictional package Laurel replaces configure(name, options) with configure({name, options}). Build synthetic TypeScript-like AST fixtures or use the repository's installed parser; source is analyzed, never executed.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create synthetic supported and ambiguous call-site fixtures.
  • Define the exact old/new API contract and a dedicated output directory.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Leading and trailing comments survive
  • Argument comments remain near their expression
  • Unrepresentable trivia causes skip

Implementation constraints

  • Do not silently relocate a directive comment.

Verification to include

  • Transform commented call
  • Use directive-like ambiguous comment

Deliverables

  • Trivia-preserving transform and cases

Rollout and recovery

Leave affected call unchanged with a review reason.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice conservative automated refactoring and reviewable uncertainty.

For the team: Inspect whether migration automation reduces repetitive work without silent semantic changes.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.