noCV
CPARSE-107 · Build recoverable syntax

Preserve configuration comments through syntax-tree editing

Practice briefStoryExpert

A key-renaming tool deletes nearby comments because the parser discards trivia. Retain comment attachment with explicit rules.

Focused work estimate
4h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Syntax trees · Tooling

Estimated field mix

  • Compiler and language tooling80%
  • Developer tooling20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

Fictional build tool Sprig reads a tiny configuration language with identifiers, strings, lists and assignments. Author the grammar and synthetic source corpus locally; parsing never executes source.

Setup prerequisites

  • Write the tiny language grammar and generated source examples.
  • Create fixtures with Unicode, truncated tokens and nested lists.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Unchanged comments survive print
  • Ambiguous attachment is documented
  • Malformed comments retain source spans

Implementation constraints

  • This ticket covers one rename transform only.

Verification to include

  • Rename commented key
  • Rename near malformed trailing comment

Deliverables

  • Trivia representation and rename round-trip

Rollout and recovery

Disable rename when comment attachment is uncertain.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice source positions, grammar boundaries and error recovery.

For the team: Inspect whether tooling errors help users correct configuration safely.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.