noCV
DCI-105 · Control change and failure

Cancel superseded pull-request runs without erasing evidence

Practice briefTaskAdvanced

A force-push starts a new run while the old run still publishes late check results under the branch name.

Focused work estimate
4h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Concurrency control · Immutable revisions

Estimated field mix

  • DevOps60%
  • Distributed systems40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional TypeScript monorepo has twelve packages and a local CI simulator. Pull requests wait for redundant work, stale caches occasionally pass broken changes, and superseded runs continue consuming executors. Create synthetic package graphs and fake check APIs; no hosted CI credentials or production repositories are supplied.

Setup prerequisites

  • Dependency graphs
  • Process exit codes
  • Test isolation

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Concurrency identity binds repository, pull request, and immutable revision
  • New revision requests cancellation of older active runs
  • Late results remain tied to their original revision and cannot satisfy the new one

Implementation constraints

  • Cancellation is cooperative and must not mark unfinished checks successful.

Verification to include

  • Start two revisions and verify only the new one remains eligible.
  • Deliver a late success from the old run and prove it cannot update the new revision.

Deliverables

  • Revision-scoped concurrency controller and race test

Rollout and recovery

Canary on the local simulator while recording saved executor time.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice treating CI as a versioned delivery system with correctness, latency, and recovery constraints.

For the team: Review a pipeline that reduces wasted compute without allowing stale or skipped checks to approve changes.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.