noCV
FORM-109 · Validate the handoff

Make a 40-line request usable on a narrow screen

Practice briefTaskIntermediate

At 200% zoom, a sticky total covers the final row and horizontal scrolling separates quantity inputs from labels. Fix the equipment-request layout.

Focused work estimate
2h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Responsive design · CSS · Accessibility

Estimated field mix

  • Accessibility60%
  • Frontend40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

The fictional Beacon operations team buys equipment through a browser form. Finance checks totals, departments, and quotes. Scope is one currency per request and an approval API contract; payments and accounting integration are excluded.

Setup prerequisites

  • Synthetic department and cost-center directory
  • Draft, submission, and approval API fixtures

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Labels, values, errors, and remove actions remain associated at the agreed narrow viewport and zoom.
  • The total and footer never cover focusable content.
  • Long vendor names and 40 lines remain readable without losing review information.

Implementation constraints

  • Use semantic CSS; do not replace rows with unlabelled visual cards.

Verification to include

  • Review the 40-line fixture by keyboard at 200% zoom and capture its final row.
  • Use a long vendor and invalid quantity; the error remains visible without horizontal page overflow.

Deliverables

  • Responsive line-item layout and zoom walkthrough

Rollout and recovery

Preview on agreed finance viewports; revert the layout if associations or actions become inaccessible.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice form modeling, exact totals, revision handling, and collaboration under failure.

For the team: Inspect whether a developer protects business workflows from duplicate, lost, or misleading submissions.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.