noCV
SFFI-107 · Control resources and concurrency

Contain a native panic without pretending the process is safe

Practice briefStoryExpert

Malformed options trigger a Rust panic that crosses the C ABI and aborts the Node process.

Focused work estimate
6h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Panic safety · Isolation boundaries · FFI

Estimated field mix

  • Systems programming60%
  • Security40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional desktop backup tool calls a small Rust compression library from Node.js. The binding leaks buffers on exceptions and treats ABI mismatches as corrupted input. Build against generated byte arrays and a local native library; no production archive format or user files are supplied.

Setup prerequisites

  • FFI ownership
  • Binary compatibility
  • Error handling

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • FFI entry points catch supported unwind cases before the ABI boundary
  • Panic maps to an internal fault with operation identity
  • Abort-configured builds are identified and isolated out of process

Implementation constraints

  • Do not claim catch_unwind protects memory after arbitrary native corruption.

Verification to include

  • Trigger a controlled recoverable panic and map its result.
  • Select an aborting fixture provider and require process-isolation policy instead of in-process execution.

Deliverables

  • Panic-boundary policy and controlled failure fixtures

Rollout and recovery

Keep risky codecs behind an external process provider until their failure mode is qualified.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice language-boundary contracts, native resource safety and version negotiation.

For the team: Review a binding that fails safely and can be rolled back before native code enters additional application paths.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.