noCV
SMEM-104 · Control resources and concurrency

Free large spill blocks without double-releasing arena pages

Practice briefChoreIntermediate

Oversized records spill to separate blocks. Error cleanup releases a spill block, then arena teardown releases the same block again.

Focused work estimate
2h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Ownership · Cleanup · Memory diagnostics

Estimated field mix

  • Systems programming70%
  • Quality engineering30%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional telemetry collector copies decoded packet fields into a small native arena. The prototype misaligns wide values and reuses memory while readers still hold views. Create a local Rust crate or C library with generated byte fixtures; no device traffic or production allocator replacement is supplied.

Setup prerequisites

  • Pointers and slices
  • Integer overflow
  • Memory alignment

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Each spill block has one recorded owner
  • Cleanup is safe when invoked repeatedly
  • Arena teardown releases only blocks still attached

Implementation constraints

  • Model ownership explicitly; a boolean freed flag cannot authorize access after release.

Verification to include

  • Allocate and release several spill blocks in different orders.
  • Inject a decode error after spill allocation and run teardown twice under a memory checker.

Deliverables

  • Spill ownership model and double-free regression

Rollout and recovery

Disable spill allocation if the checker reports any invalid release.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice representation invariants, lifetimes, unsafe-boundary review and memory diagnostics.

For the team: Review a component whose allocation failures and corruption cases are explicit before reuse in latency-sensitive code.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.