noCV
SRUNTIME-106 · Control resources and concurrency

Bound heap-like values without adding a garbage collector

Practice briefBugAdvanced

A proposed LIST instruction allocates on every loop iteration and the prototype retains all intermediate values.

Focused work estimate
4h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Runtime memory · Tradeoff analysis · Leak testing

Estimated field mix

  • Systems programming60%
  • Performance engineering40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional rules engine executes a tiny arithmetic bytecode over synthetic integers. Its interpreter trusts jump offsets and can run forever. Build a local Rust runtime; it has no filesystem, network, dynamic loading, host calls, or candidate-source execution.

Setup prerequisites

  • Stacks
  • Instruction decoding
  • Control flow

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Compare arena reset, reference counting, and no-list alternatives for the bounded language
  • Chosen design defines maximum live bytes and value count
  • Budget failure releases all runtime-owned allocations

Implementation constraints

  • Do not introduce tracing collection without a workload and cycle requirement that needs it.

Verification to include

  • Evaluate a bounded list program and reconcile peak live bytes.
  • Allocate until the value budget and confirm clean failure without leaks.

Deliverables

  • Memory strategy decision and bounded-value prototype

Rollout and recovery

Keep LIST disabled until the memory contract is accepted.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice runtime invariants, validation, resource accounting and compatibility.

For the team: Review a constrained execution component whose malformed programs fail deterministically without gaining host capabilities.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.