noCV
SRUNTIME-107 · Control resources and concurrency

Cache validated programs without confusing bytecode revisions

Practice briefStoryExpert

A cached validation result for version one is reused after an opcode gains a wider operand in version two.

Focused work estimate
6h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Cache correctness · Versioning · Hashing

Estimated field mix

  • Systems programming60%
  • Compiler and language tooling40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional rules engine executes a tiny arithmetic bytecode over synthetic integers. Its interpreter trusts jump offsets and can run forever. Build a local Rust runtime; it has no filesystem, network, dynamic loading, host calls, or candidate-source execution.

Setup prerequisites

  • Stacks
  • Instruction decoding
  • Control flow

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Cache identity binds exact bytes, bytecode version, validator version, and limits
  • Validation failure is not cached across a newer validator
  • Hash collision handling cannot return another program

Implementation constraints

  • Cache entries contain immutable validated metadata and bounded program bytes only.

Verification to include

  • Reuse one validated program under identical authority.
  • Change each identity dimension and require a miss; inject a key collision and compare bytes.

Deliverables

  • Versioned validation cache and collision tests

Rollout and recovery

Enable read-through caching after hit/miss telemetry reconciles with validation calls.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice runtime invariants, validation, resource accounting and compatibility.

For the team: Review a constrained execution component whose malformed programs fail deterministically without gaining host capabilities.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.