noCV
AIMAGE-107 · Promote exact artifacts

Make artifact promotion idempotent across lost CI responses

Practice briefBugExpert

A CI runner loses the promotion response and retries, creating competing rollout records for one digest.

Focused work estimate
5h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Idempotency · Transactions

Estimated field mix

  • Platform engineering60%
  • Database engineering40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional reporting API is rebuilt separately for staging and production. Different dependency resolutions and mutable tags make incident rollback unreliable.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a tiny local HTTP service and nonprivileged image build.
  • Use synthetic registries or provider fixtures; no production deployment.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Use a stable promotion key bound to environment and digest.
  • Retries resolve one durable promotion record.
  • Changed digest under the same key returns conflict.

Implementation constraints

  • Persist selection and audit metadata atomically.

Verification to include

  • Drop a response after commit and retry the same selection.
  • Reuse a promotion key for another digest and retain the original selection.

Deliverables

  • Idempotent promotion command

Rollout and recovery

Enable for synthetic environments; pause conflicting promotions and retain their audit records.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice artifact identity, least privilege and reproducible delivery.

For the team: Review whether deployed bytes can be traced and rolled back reliably.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.