noCV
ASAGA-102 · Define workflow facts

Define stable provider command keys for each return step

Practice briefTaskIntermediate

A retry after a lost response creates a second shipping label because each request receives a new key.

Focused work estimate
2h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Idempotency · Provider contracts

Estimated field mix

  • Distributed systems60%
  • Integrations40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional equipment-rental service approves returns through several provider calls. Partial failures leave labels issued without inspections or refunds reported before provider confirmation.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create synthetic return records and fake inspection, shipping and refund adapters.
  • Use integer money values and no real payments or messages.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Bind keys to return identity, step and generation.
  • Reuse keys for equivalent retries.
  • Reject changed canonical input under an existing key.

Implementation constraints

  • Do not reuse one key across unrelated provider actions.

Verification to include

  • Repeat a label request and resolve one fake provider result.
  • Change shipping destination under the same key and return conflict.

Deliverables

  • Step identity contract and provider-key tests

Rollout and recovery

Use stable keys before enabling retries; reconcile legacy ambiguous effects separately.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice durable workflow state, compensation and uncertain outcomes.

For the team: Review recoverable business operations without assuming distributed transactions.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.