noCV
BARTIF-107 · Recover releases

Withdraw a defective artifact without deleting incident history

Practice briefTaskAdvanced

Deleting a bad image makes historical deployment records impossible to inspect.

Focused work estimate
3h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Lifecycle management

Estimated field mix

  • Platform engineering40%
  • Security40%
  • Cloud infrastructure20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional application team deploys mutable image tags and cannot reliably identify the artifact running during an incident.

Setup prerequisites

  • Author synthetic artifact manifests and a local registry double; do not pull or execute untrusted images.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Mark the digest withdrawn with reason and actor.
  • Block new promotion of withdrawn artifacts.
  • Preserve manifests and prior deployment references.

Implementation constraints

  • Withdrawal is append-only state, not evidence deletion.

Verification to include

  • Withdraw a synthetic defective artifact.
  • Reject new promotion while retaining historical reads.

Deliverables

  • Artifact withdrawal workflow.

Rollout and recovery

Withdraw before cleanup; use a separate approved retention policy.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice artifact identity, promotion policies, and release provenance.

For the team: Provide reproducible deployments and a clear path to withdraw defective artifacts.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.