noCV
BCRM-109 · Operate safely

Plan a full CRM resynchronization without erasing local edits

Practice briefTaskExpert

A corrupted cursor requires a new import while staff continue editing customer records.

Focused work estimate
5h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Migration design · Consistency

Estimated field mix

  • System design40%
  • Integrations40%
  • Distributed systems20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional account team sees overwritten edits, duplicate contacts, and stale opt-out preferences after synchronization retries.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local CRM double and synthetic contact records for two organizations; no real personal data or CRM credentials.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Freeze an import boundary and preserve concurrent local revisions.
  • Compare merge strategies and conflict workload.
  • Rehearse resumption and cancellation without bulk replacement.

Implementation constraints

  • Keep the exercise bounded to the synthetic dataset.

Verification to include

  • Resume an interrupted full import.
  • Edit a contact mid-import and verify conflict preservation.

Deliverables

  • Resynchronization decision record.

Rollout and recovery

Run read-only comparison first; apply reviewed differences in bounded batches.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice sync cursors, conflict policies, privacy boundaries, and replay.

For the team: Provide predictable customer-data synchronization with inspectable conflicts.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.