noCV
BMONO-105 · Build the planner

Explain why each selected command is necessary

Practice briefStoryIntermediate

Maintainers cannot review a large affected set because the tool prints only package names.

Focused work estimate
2h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
CLI design · Developer experience

Estimated field mix

  • Developer tooling100%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional internal tools team maintains eighteen packages. Engineers currently run everything because the affected-package script occasionally misses downstream consumers.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local six-package fixture with a dependency cycle, shared compiler configuration, and two example changes.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Attach at least one changed input to each selected task.
  • Represent transitive paths without unbounded recursion.
  • Emit stable JSON and readable plain-text output.

Implementation constraints

  • Keep absolute workstation paths out of exported plans.

Verification to include

  • Snapshot a direct and a transitive explanation.
  • Verify cyclic and missing-owner explanations remain bounded.

Deliverables

  • Plan explanation renderer.

Rollout and recovery

Enable explanation output immediately; keep command execution opt-in.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice graph analysis, reproducible commands, and safe developer-tool failure modes.

For the team: Produce an inspectable CI selection plan that avoids unnecessary work without silently skipping consumers.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.