noCV
SIPC-106 · Control resources and concurrency

Classify worker exit before deciding whether to retry

Practice briefBugAdvanced

The worker exits after writing its output but before the acknowledgement frame; automatic retry may produce a second external artifact.

Focused work estimate
4h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Distributed failure · Idempotency · State machines

Estimated field mix

  • Systems programming60%
  • Distributed systems40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional document converter launches local sandbox substitutes as child processes. Its prototype parses newline-delimited output, leaks descriptors, and retries requests after ambiguous worker exits. Create a Rust supervisor and deterministic worker fixtures; no document content or production sandbox is supplied.

Setup prerequisites

  • File descriptors
  • Framing
  • Process signals

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Outcome distinguishes not-started, running, acknowledged, failed, and unknown
  • Unknown completion requires status lookup or explicit review
  • Retry reuses the stable operation identity

Implementation constraints

  • Do not infer failure solely from pipe closure or process exit code.

Verification to include

  • Exercise exits before start and after acknowledged completion.
  • Exit after effect but before acknowledgement and preserve UNKNOWN without blind retry.

Deliverables

  • Exit classification state machine and ambiguity fixtures

Rollout and recovery

Disable automatic retry for unknown outcomes until the worker supports reconciliation.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice IPC contracts, resource inheritance, process supervision and ambiguous completion.

For the team: Review a local worker boundary that contains crashes and preserves request outcomes before connecting an isolated execution provider.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.