Define extraction-provider deadlines and uncertain completion semantics
A provider times out after accepting work; blindly retrying may launch duplicate expensive processing.
- Focused work estimate
- 5h + prerequisites
- Priority in the scenario
- Medium
- Engineering practice
- Distributed failure · Provider design
Estimated field mix
- System design50%
- Distributed systems50%
Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.
Review it, then add it to your workspace.
The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.
Project context
A fictional procurement portal extracts metadata from uploaded documents. Product wants a responsive upload flow; security wants parser failures isolated from customer-facing processes.
Setup prerequisites
- Create synthetic upload metadata and a fake processing provider.
- Treat diagrams as proposals; implement only local contract probes.
Preceding work
Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.
- ABOUND-101 · Translate document-processing expectations into a bounded workload model
- ABOUND-102 · Draw the document trust boundary with authoritative state owners
- ABOUND-103 · Write the decision record for direct-to-storage document upload
- ABOUND-104 · Specify a document lifecycle that survives parser retries
- ABOUND-105 · Design the transactional dispatch contract for extraction work
Acceptance criteria
- Separate rejected, accepted, completed and unknown outcomes.
- Use an idempotent provider request identity and status lookup.
- Define bounded retry and operator-visible unresolved states.
Implementation constraints
- Model uncertain responses explicitly rather than interpreting timeout as failure.
Verification to include
- Timeout after acceptance and reconcile by request identity.
- Return an unresolved status until the deadline and keep completion unclaimed.
Deliverables
- Provider contract and uncertainty state probe
Rollout and recovery
Use the fake provider to validate behavior; fail closed when a real adapter lacks required identity guarantees.
Value of the work
For the engineer: Practice boundary decisions backed by executable consistency and failure checks.
For the team: Review architecture tradeoffs with explicit assumptions before infrastructure commitment.
Evidence boundaries
Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.
Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.