noCV
BEXTRACT-108 · Support correction

Preserve corrections as append-only reviewer decisions

Practice briefStoryAdvanced

Staff corrections overwrite the extracted values, making later disagreement impossible to investigate.

Focused work estimate
3h 30m + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Auditability · Concurrency

Estimated field mix

  • Backend50%
  • Applied AI30%
  • Database engineering20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional procurement team receives inconsistent supplier documents. It wants draft records that staff can review without treating model output as authoritative accounting data.

Setup prerequisites

  • Author synthetic text invoices with ambiguous dates, currencies, and line items; use a deterministic provider double.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Record original value, corrected value, reviewer, and reason.
  • Require optimistic revision control for concurrent review.
  • Keep source and extractor output immutable.

Implementation constraints

  • Review actions must be tenant-scoped.

Verification to include

  • Correct a draft and inspect both versions.
  • Reject stale revisions and cross-tenant review attempts.

Deliverables

  • Correction history workflow.

Rollout and recovery

Enable on draft records first; retain prior review state when a correction fails.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice schema constraints, numerical checks, review workflows, and safe model boundaries.

For the team: Produce an inspectable extraction prototype that can reduce manual transcription while preserving review control.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.