noCV
DREL-109 · Operate and improve

Resume promotion after the registry response disappears

Practice briefTaskExpert

The registry accepts a promotion tag and drops the response; retry sees the tag but cannot tell whether it was created by this operation.

Focused work estimate
6h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Idempotency · Registry APIs · Recovery

Estimated field mix

  • DevOps60%
  • Integrations40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional scheduling API is rebuilt separately for test, staging, and production-like local environments. The resulting images differ, release notes list the branch instead of the artifact, and rollback rebuilds old source with new dependencies. Use a local registry simulator and synthetic deployments; no cluster or customer traffic is supplied.

Setup prerequisites

  • Artifact digests
  • Release states
  • Health checks

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Promotion uses deterministic operation identity
  • Retry reads digest and operation metadata before mutation
  • Conflicting existing tag becomes visible and blocks automatic continuation

Implementation constraints

  • The registry adapter is local and provider responses are treated as untrusted input.

Verification to include

  • Promote and replay one operation with the same result.
  • Drop the acceptance response and separately precreate a conflicting tag.

Deliverables

  • Idempotent promotion adapter and ambiguity tests

Rollout and recovery

Enable one registry namespace while retaining digest-only deployment.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice immutable promotion, release authority, compatibility gates, canaries, and rollback.

For the team: Review a delivery flow that can identify exactly what is running and restore a known artifact without rebuilding it.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.