noCV
SIPC-107 · Control resources and concurrency

Terminate a process tree without signaling unrelated work

Practice briefStoryExpert

A timed-out worker launches a helper. Killing only the parent leaks the helper; reusing a process-group identifier risks signaling a newer process.

Focused work estimate
6h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
Process groups · Identity fencing · Cleanup

Estimated field mix

  • Systems programming60%
  • Security40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional document converter launches local sandbox substitutes as child processes. Its prototype parses newline-delimited output, leaks descriptors, and retries requests after ambiguous worker exits. Create a Rust supervisor and deterministic worker fixtures; no document content or production sandbox is supplied.

Setup prerequisites

  • File descriptors
  • Framing
  • Process signals

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Each operation owns a fresh supervised process group or platform job object
  • Termination verifies the group identity before signaling
  • Cleanup observes all declared descendants or reports unresolved members

Implementation constraints

  • Tests use inert local helpers and never enumerate or signal arbitrary host processes.

Verification to include

  • Terminate a fixture parent and its two waiting children.
  • Reuse a synthetic numeric identifier and prove identity validation blocks the stale cleanup.

Deliverables

  • Process-tree lifecycle adapter and safe termination tests

Rollout and recovery

Keep worker concurrency at one until descendant cleanup is reliable.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice IPC contracts, resource inheritance, process supervision and ambiguous completion.

For the team: Review a local worker boundary that contains crashes and preserves request outcomes before connecting an isolated execution provider.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.