noCV
ABATCH-107 · Coordinate parallel outcomes

Apply a run deadline without rewriting late check facts

Practice briefStoryIntermediate

A slow checker returns after the review deadline and overwrites a summary already shown to the user.

Focused work estimate
3h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
Medium
Engineering practice
Temporal workflows · Append-only results

Estimated field mix

  • Distributed systems60%
  • Backend40%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional vendor portal runs format, policy and duplicate checks in parallel. A slow checker blocks completion, while duplicate callbacks can produce contradictory final summaries.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create synthetic document identities and three fake check providers.
  • No real risk scoring, hiring decisions or candidate execution is included.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Define a deadline terminal state with explicit incomplete checks.
  • Preserve late results as appended facts without mutating the frozen summary.
  • Allow a new run or reviewed amendment under an explicit policy.

Implementation constraints

  • Use an injected clock and exact boundary cases.

Verification to include

  • Complete required checks before deadline.
  • Return one check after deadline and retain the original summary plus late-result visibility.

Deliverables

  • Deadline finalization and late-result cases

Rollout and recovery

Canary synthetic short deadlines; create new runs when a policy change requires reevaluation.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice fan-out/fan-in, deadline policies and immutable aggregation.

For the team: Review trustworthy partial-result handling and controllable parallel work.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.