noCV
BAPIBULK-109 · Support clients

Choose atomic or partial bulk semantics for dependent items

Practice briefTaskExpert

Some imports contain parent and child catalog records, making arbitrary independent item processing unsafe.

Focused work estimate
5h + prerequisites
Priority in the scenario
High
Engineering practice
API architecture · Tradeoffs

Estimated field mix

  • System design40%
  • API design40%
  • Database engineering20%

Field percentages are editorial estimates of the ticket's engineering focus. They total 100%; they are not measured time, proficiency scores, or ownership evidence.

Your next step

Review it, then add it to your workspace.

The board opens an editable draft; nothing is saved until you confirm it. Sign-in and workspace permissions apply, and Demo boards remain ephemeral.

Project context

A fictional catalog API needs to accept imports too large for one synchronous request. Partners need to distinguish accepted work, completed items, and recoverable failures.

Setup prerequisites

  • Create a local API and worker double with synthetic catalog records and controlled interruption points.

Preceding work

Complete these dependencies, or supply their agreed outputs before taking this ticket.

Acceptance criteria

  • Define the supported dependency boundary.
  • Compare whole-request atomicity, ordered groups, and independent items.
  • Document transaction, recovery, and client complexity tradeoffs.

Implementation constraints

  • Bound the decision to the synthetic catalog use case.

Verification to include

  • Import a valid parent-child group.
  • Reject or explicitly report a missing-parent group under the chosen semantics.

Deliverables

  • Bulk semantics decision record.

Rollout and recovery

Start with the smallest supported grouping and reject unsupported dependency patterns.

Value of the work

For the engineer: Practice asynchronous resource contracts, partial outcomes, and idempotent operations.

For the team: Provide predictable bulk integration behavior without ambiguous success or repeated effects.

Evidence boundaries

Outcome Evidence: Tests, patches, and runbooks are requested deliverables. They become Outcome Evidence only through a qualified Mission and immutable Evidence IDs.

Ownership Evidence: Independent adaptation must be observed under a declared verification policy and cite immutable Evidence IDs. Completing a planning ticket establishes no Ownership Evidence.